Posts

Let Me Explain Welfare Dependency

At first glance, poverty seems to be an easy problem to solve (until you think about it). Just give the poor support and money, right? They'll be able to get jobs and start supporting themselves, breaking the poverty cycle, right?  That'll only last until they start relying on the welfare, and once that happens, everything goes wrong.  Welfare dependency is a huge problem in the United States, and a lot of it comes from the fact that prices are rising, wages are staying the same, and housing is harder than ever to find. When a family needs welfare to be able to feed their kids, or when they're $100 short of being able to rent a roof over their heads, it's hard to advocate for cutting off the aid. Which is why I'm not going to advocate for doing that. But giving out the welfare poses its own problems. What happens when those who aren't truly poor start abusing the system (because trust me, they will)? What happens when someone's on welfare  but doesn't se...

Let Me Explain the Housing Crisis

The US has a housing crisis. You've probably seen it for yourself, because buying a home or renting an apartment is almost impossible right now. Prices and rents are way too high, and even if you can  afford it, there's almost no houses on the market right now. Part of it comes from inflation, the result of the flaming train that is unregulated government spending. As a refresher: when the government spends too much on something, the increase in demand of one good means that the price of that good increases. If the price of wood increases, for example, businesses that need that wood for maintenance will increase the prices of their products to be able to keep their income. This cascades down the economy, eventually leading to extremely high housing prices. Another part of it comes from there simply not being enough houses in the first place. It's hard to move out from a tiny apartment when there are no townhouses being sold that meet your requirements. It's hard to buy ...

Let Me Explain The Electoral College (And Why It Sucks)

The Electoral College could very well be classified as one of the most unintentionally stupid  ideas to ever have been created. I won't bore you with an intro today, as I don't have the patience. Instead, I'll just describe the absolute abomination that it is. Use your brain from here on out. Say there's two candidates running for president. If a certain presidential candidate wins a state, then they get all of the state's electoral votes. The number of votes they receive is proportional to population: for example, California, being the absolute population juggernaut it is, gets 54 votes. Almost uninhabited Wyoming gets 3. (No offense to you, Wyomingians). If you work out the actual math, though, California should get 52 votes, and Wyoming should get 1. Why is there a two-vote surplus? Because the creators of the Electoral College were concerned about large states having a lot of power compared to small ones, so they added two votes to every state to give smaller st...

Let Me Explain Polarization

If there's anything that all Americans can pretty much agree on, it's that the country is at war with itself. (It's literally the stop hitting yourself  meme). We all collectively groan at it, and compromise between the political left and right is almost impossible when we turn our heads and start yelling at each other. I'm not going to claim I'm an expert on political human psychology, and I'm not going to preach that everybody should just calm down and take a chill pill , because we all know that saying that doesn't actually do anything. The good news is that there is actual stuff we can do. Hope really isn't lost yet. I will talk about why people who want to entertain both sides of issues don't get represented in politics, though. Say you're an aspiring politician. You have views from both the left and right, and you're going to start a campaign for mayor, for example. You need money for your campaign, and having the support of more major ...

Let Me Explain Corporations in Politics

 Basically any political campaign nowadays runs on one thing, and only one thing: money. This has always been true, but now it's to so large an extent that corporations are basically running politics. Your voice gets diminished while the corporations throw a lobbying party. So how did we get here? In 2010 the Supreme Court had a case on its hands: Citizens United vs. the FEC (Federal Election Commission). Before the case, it had been a century where the FEC had rules prohibiting corporations from "independent political spending". Citizens United, a nonprofit group, sued the FEC for having these rules, saying that prohibiting corporations from spending violated the corporations' First Amendment right to free speech. The Supreme Court sided with Citizens United (an ironic name, given that they definitely weren't united for the citizens , if you catch my drift). Let me walk you through what this decision means. As an individual, you can't donate beyond a few thou...

Let Me Explain Tariffs

So, tariffs. They're obviously a hot topic right now, because the US is on the brink of embracing them lovingly and making them central to our foreign and economic policy. And the internet is in a war over it. That's why I wanted to break down what tariffs actually are and what they do to prices. So what are tariffs? Tariffs are taxes paid by importers. If X in America buys something from Y in another country, a tariff would mean that X has to pay a tax if they want to keep importing stuff from Y. There's two major reasons someone would want tariffs. Making more domestic jobs: A tariff obviously doesn't apply to stuff made in America, so if buying from Y is more expensive than buying from domestic industries, companies will start buying from domestic producers instead of foreign ones. This means that domestic producers make more money and get to expand and create jobs for American workers. Relying less on other countries: We obviously don't want to be dependent on...

Let Me Explain Tax Brackets

 The politically polarized internet keeps screaming about one of two things: either it's "inequality" or it's "the economy is being ruined". A lot of the debate seems to center around tax brackets, and what level of taxes lower and middle-class people pay as opposed to the upper classes. So there's two types of tax structures, and people either support one or the other: "progressive" tax structures, with the rich paying a higher percent than the poor, and "regressive" tax structures, with the rich paying less. Before we get into tax brackets by the way, I want to clear up a huge mistake people make when talking about this: say you're making $79999 a year, and the next tax bracket starts at $80000. Your taxes will not  suddenly jump if you make $80001 a year. You first have to pay the previous tax rate for everything you earned below $80000, and pay a higher rate for the $1 extra dollar (which will of course be almost literally not...